We seem to be looking for universal principles, when we should be looking for fragmentation.
It’s quite common when trying to understand something that we try to simplify it, searching for consistencies and core principals. The problem is when we apply the find to other stuff as well as a universal principal for everything similar.
Even though universal laws or guidelines might seem like a good idea, it is often the complete opposite of something useful.
- Take the Music Industry as an example. These days they are trying to find the ONE law to rule them all, to solve the problem for both universal, international, national or independent artists and bands – but is there ONE undiscovered answer? Or should there be many?
As we become more insightful and smarter regarding a subject, our articulation of it increases which leads us to discover details that we didn’t know existed to begin with
. As a subject gets bigger we also find minute differences and details that make what seemed similar quite opposite.
Ignoring the nuances and fragmentation’s inside a subject as we try to make our ideas accessible to other people through graphs and sound bites :o), makes it easier to get understood, but demands the reader to ask more questions. (which is a good thing)
I hope the people reading this blog understand that I’m not trying to find universal answers. I’m exploring a landscape, square inch by square inch. And one answer might be a good solution to one problem, but might not give a full and complete answer to a lot of other stuff, or even be downright terrible.
Malcolm Gladwell inspired me to start thinking of this whole thing as a giant puzzle:
- “We are all collecting small pieces of the same puzzle
and / or partner. The advantages of psychosexual therapymajority of patients regardless of the underlying cialis.
. One day maybe we’ll get so far that it starts making sense.”
